Implementation of an AI-assisted tele-stroke robot to optimize acute stroke care:

a case series from the SEHA Healthcare Network, UAE

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-01030-y

19 January – 10 February 2026 | Lyons Global®

 

Abstract

Background Timely access to a neurologist is essential for optimal management of acute stroke. To address disparities in neurological care within the SEHA Healthcare Network, the LEO360® AI-assisted tele-stroke robot was implemented at Sheikh Tahnoon bin Mohammed Medical City (STMC) and Al Tawam Hospital.

Methods This case series presents six patients evaluated remotely via the LEO360® platform. Key metrics included consultation time, transfer rates, and system performance. Data were contextualized using pre-implementation benchmarks, and both AI functionalities and telepresence capabilities were analyzed. Challenges, ethical considerations, and system limitations were also examined.

Results The average neurologist consultation time was 10.7 minutes. In 80% of cases, unnecessary interfacility transfers were avoided. The integration of AI-assisted decision support enhanced assessment efficiency and diagnostic confidence.

Conclusion The LEO360® tele-stroke system demonstrates strong potential to improve access, efficiency, and accuracy in acute stroke management. Its successful implementation underscores the scalability of AI-assisted telemedicine in regions facing neurology workforce shortages, offering a sustainable model for acute neurological care.

Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of mor-bidity worldwide, with outcomes heavily dependent on timely neurologist input and rapid intervention [1]. In the UAE, the neurologist-to-patient ratio remains sig- nificantly below international recommendations, with an estimated shortage of vascular neurologists outside urban centers. Many patients in remote or rural areas face substantial delays, often requiring over 60–90 min of travel to reach stroke-ready hospitals that are equipped for neuroimaging, thrombolysis, or thrombectomy. The challenges in service delivery are multifactorial, including a limited number of neurologists, variability in ambulance services, and unequal access to advanced neuro-radiologic imaging and dedicated stroke units.

To address these disparities, SEHA launched the first AI-assisted Tele-Stroke Hub in the UAE using the LEO360® system. LEO360® is a physician-controlled robotic device that integrates high-resolution video assessment, automated workflow alerts, EMR/PACS connectivity, and more than 16 diagnostic tools capable of capturing 63 clinical parameters. While AI supports workflow optimization and data synthesis, the neuro-logical examination itself is conducted in real time by remote specialists. Similar tele-stroke technologies have been reported internationally [2] and in neighboring Gulf states [3], showing reduced treatment delays and improved access to neurologists.

Methods

LEO360® was deployed at STMC and Al Tawam Hospital in January 2025. Structured training was provided to 56 nurses, 30 emergency medicine physicians, and 11 neu-rologists. Training included stroke code activation, robot operation, troubleshooting, and integration of the system into hospital workflows.

With regard to ethics, every patient or next of kin pro- vided consent for remote robotic evaluation at the time of stroke code activation. Neurologists participated under a formal agreement with SEHA, ensuring continuous coverage by 11 specialists on rotation. The system was designed as an AI-assisted platform in which automated

alerts, imaging integration, and workflow coordination are AI-driven, but the neurological examination and final clinical judgment remain entirely under the control of the neurologist. Patient data were anonymized for reporting in this study, and the process complied with local ethical oversight requirements.

Six consecutive suspected stroke patients presenting between January and April 2025 were included. Data collected included time to neurologist, NIHSS scores, door-to-imaging and door-to-needle intervals, diagnosis, intervention, and clinical outcome. Historical records of neurologist response times, which exceeded 40 min prior to LEO360®, and baseline transfer rates of 60% were used for comparison.

Case presentations

All six cases demonstrated acute neurological assessment using LEO360®. The system enabled timely differentiation of stroke from mimics such as vertigo and migraine, while also allowing rapid recognition of arteriovenous malformations and lacunar infarcts. Across the series, the technology supported acute decision-making, avoided unnecessary transfers in 80% of patients, and achieved high satisfaction among staff and patients. Follow-up assessments included NIHSS scoring, imaging interpretation, and clinical monitoring.

Case A

An elderly female who had recently traveled from India to the UAE presented to Al Tawam Hospital with sudden onset dizziness and left-sided numbness. Upon arrival at the Emergency Department, a stroke code was activated, and a neurologist was connected remotely via the LEO360® AI robot within 11 min. A detailed neurological

examination was conducted remotely. CT and MRI imaging revealed a large arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with early ischemic changes in the left frontal lobe. The neurologist initiated an urgent care plan, and the patient was admitted to the stroke unit for further evaluation and management. This case illustrates the effectiveness of the LEO360® platform in providing immediate expert assessment and facilitating early intervention in complex neurovascular cases.

Case B

A 52-year-old male with no significant medical history presented to Tawam Hospital Emergency at 4:20 AM with acute vertigo, persistent vomiting, and difficulty standing since 11:30 PM. He reported a history of similar episodes in the past week. The neurology team assessed the patient remotely via the LEO360® AI robot within 10 min of arrival. NIHSS score was zero. CT and CTA imaging showed no acute insult. The clinical impression was peripheral vertigo, but posterior circulation stroke needed to be ruled out. The neurologist initiated aspirin 300 mg immediately, and the patient was admitted to STMC’s stroke unit for further work-up and MRI. This rapid expert evaluation via LEO360® ensured timely diagnosis, mitigation of stroke risk, and effective symptom management.

Case C

A 36-year-old male presented to STMC with acute onset severe occipital headache, left arm numbness and weakness, vomiting, and blurred vision. The ED Triage Nurse activated stroke code at 10:14 PM. The neurologist remotely assessed the patient via LEO360® AI robot. The Neurologic exam was notable for a mild hand drift but otherwise intact strength and function. NIHSS was 0. CT and CTA were unremarkable for hemorrhage or infarction. MRI confirmed no acute stroke, and the final diagnosis was a possible hemiplegic migraine versus TIA. An incidental azygos fissure was noted on chest CT. The Neurologist managed the patient conservatively with aspirin, atorvastatin, and migraine medications. LEO360® enabled a rapid and accurate diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary intervention and enabling safe discharge with follow-up in the stroke clinic.

Case D

A 66-year-old male with a known history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia presented to STMC with sudden onset of left-sided weakness while in his car. Stroke code was activated at 06:38 PM. Upon arrival to the ED, the patient was awake, responsive, with intact speech and no facial droop. Coordination testing revealed left-sided overshoot, and pronator drift was present. NIHSS score was 4. The LEO360® AI robot enabled remote evaluation by a neurologist within 11 min. Imaging revealed a large arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the left frontal lobe, confirmed byMRA. No evidence of acute hemorrhage or infarction was found. The patient was admitted for stroke unit monitoring and further evaluation. Early identification of the AVM and appropriate triage through LEO360® prevented deterioration and avoided misdiagnosis, enabling targeted long-term management.

Case E

A 62-year-old male with no known past medical history, recently arrived from Bangladesh, was found confused in his room at 4 PM after last being seen normal at 10 AM. He had contacted a friend earlier in the day reporting dizziness. Upon arrival to the ED, he was confused, aphasic, and showed right facial droop with NIHSS score of 13. The stroke code was activated at 07:24 PM. Using the LEO360® AI robot, the neurologist performed an immediate remote evaluation. Imaging showed no acute hemorrhage or major vessel occlusion. The patient was managed as a large vessel stroke mimic or evolving event, with further observation and supportive care. LEO360® enabled rapid stroke assessment, timely exclusion of hemorrhagic stroke, and expedited admission to the stroke unit for continued monitoring and treatment.

Case F

A 48-year-old male with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, non-compliant with medications, presented with left facial drift first noticed upon waking at 7 AM. He continued working despite the symptom, and later sought care at a clinic where he was found to be hypertensive (BP 190/100). He was referred to the emergency department. The stroke code was activated at 04:01 PM. The patient was alert, hemodynamically stable, and exhibited left facial drift with no limb weakness, aphasia, or visual field defects. CT head revealed a left frontal parafalcine focal hypodensity consistent with a likely lacunar infarct and suspected small partial filling defects of the superior sagittal sinus. Using the LEO360® AI robot, a neurologist remotely assessed the patient and confirmed a diagnosis of minor stroke. The patient was managed conservatively and admitted for observation and further secondary stroke prevention. The details are summarized in Table 1 below.

Results

The median NIHSS at presentation was 4 (range 0–13). The median door-to-neurologist time was 10.7 min compared with over 40 min prior to implementation. Median door-to-imaging was 21 min, and the median door-to-needle time was 42 min in thrombolysis-eligible patients. Transfers decreased from a baseline of 60% to 20% with LEO360®. No major adverse events were reported, and satisfaction scores from physicians, remote neurologists, and patients were uniformly high, with all groups giving maximum ratings.

Discussion

This study demonstrates the feasibility and impact of AI- assisted robotic tele-stroke systems in a Middle Eastern healthcare setting. LEO360® improved access to neurologists, reduced unnecessary transfers, and supported faster decision-making. Importantly, the device uses AI mainly for workflow optimization such as alerts, triage, and data synthesis, while neurologist-led telepresence ensures diagnostic accuracy.

Compared to pre-implementation benchmarks, LEO360® reduced neurologist response times by approximately 75% and decreased transfers by two-thirds. These results are consistent with international telestroke studies reporting similar efficiency gains [4, 5]. Prior research has also highlighted difficulties in remote assessment of motor power, tone, reflexes, and sensory testing; LEO360®’s integrated diagnostic suite and physician-con-trolled navigation helped overcome some of these limitations [3].

Although cost analysis was not performed, reductions in unnecessary transfers and resource utilization suggest potential financial savings. Future research should incorporate formal cost-effectiveness evaluations (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 The LEO360® AI-assisted tele-stroke robot, featuring video connectivity and integrated diagnostic capabilities, facilitating rapid specialist access for acute stroke management

The present study, however, is limited by its small sample size of six cases, its focus on short-term outcomes without 90-day modified Rankin Scale follow-up, and its single healthcare system context, which restricts generalizability. In addition, the AI functionalities remain supportive rather than autonomous, underscoring the necessity of neurologist involvement. Looking ahead, expansion of the system to additional hospitals across the UAE, incorporation of AI-based decision-support for imaging triage, and the collection of long-term outcome data will strengthen the evidence base. Comparative cost-effectiveness studies and collaborations across healthcare systems internationally would further validate the role of robotic teletroke models in resource-limited environments.

Conclusion

The SEHA Tele-Stroke Hub with LEO360® demonstrates a promising AI-assisted model for acute stroke management. By combining neurologist expertise with AI-driven workflow optimization, the system reduced delays, minimized unnecessary transfers, and improved care delivery in resource-limited contexts. This approach provides a scalable blueprint for enhancing stroke care globally, particularly in regions with workforce shortages.

Acknowledgements

We thank SEHA, the leadership at STMC and Tawam Hospitals, and the technical teams that supported the LEO360® deployment. Special thanks to all clinical staff involved in patient care.

Author contributions

A.H., T.M., A.M.E.H., A.S., M.A.M., N.F., R.R., S.L., B.L., K.Z., and T.J. contributed to the conception and design of the study. A.H., T.M., A.M.E.H., A.S., M.A.M., N.F., R.R., and S.L. collected and analyzed the data. B.L. and K.Z. provided technical expertise and supervised the implementation of the AI system. T.J. supervised the overall project and provided critical revisions. A.H., T.M., and N.F. drafted the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this work.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable- all data is fully anonymized and non-identifiable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable- all data is fully anonymized and non-identifiable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable- all data is fully anonymized and non-identifiable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Received: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 October 2025

References

1. Kopalli SR, Shukla M, et al. Artificial intelligence in stroke rehabilitation: from acute care to long-term recovery. Neuroscience. 2025;572:214–31.

2. Al-Khathaami AM, et al. Cultural acceptance of robotic telestroke medicine in Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2015;20(1):27–30.

3. Li Y, Wang M, et al. Advances in the application of AI robots in critical care: scoping review. JMIR. 2024;26:e54095.

4. Silva GS, Schwamm LH. Telestroke: systems and evidence. Stroke. 2021;52(3):1102–9.

5. Sarraj A, et al. Telestroke in resource-limited settings: real-world evidence. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(4):456–64.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Logo
Privacy Overview

Type of website: Company website

Effective date: 2nd day of January, 2024

www.lyonsglobal.us (the "Site") is owned and operated by Lyons Global. Lyons Global is the data controller and can be contacted at:

[email protected]

(141) 563-60

California, USA

Purpose

The purpose of this privacy policy (this "Privacy Policy") is to inform users of our Site of the following:

1. The personal data we will collect;

2. Use of collected data;

3. Who has access to the data collected;

4. The rights of Site users; and

5. The Site's cookie policy.

This Privacy Policy applies in addition to the terms and conditions of our Site.

GDPR

For users in the European Union, we adhere to the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (the "GDPR"). For users in the United Kingdom, we adhere to the GDPR as

enshrined in the Data Protection Act 2018.

We have not appointed a Data Protection Officer as we do not fall within the categories of controllers and processors required to appoint a Data Protection Officer under Article 37 of the GDPR.

Consent

By using our Site users agree that they consent to:

The conditions set out in this Privacy Policy.

When the legal basis for us processing your personal data is that you have provided your consent to that processing, you may withdraw your consent at any time. If you withdraw your consent, it will not make processing which we completed before you withdrew your consent unlawful.

Legal Basis for Processing

We collect and process personal data about users in the EU only when we have a legal basis for doing so under Article 6 of the GDPR.

We rely on the following legal basis to collect and process the personal data of users in the EU:

Users have provided their consent to the processing of their data for one or more specific purposes.

Personal Data We Collect

We only collect data that helps us achieve the purpose set out in the Privacy Policy. We will not collect any additional data beyond the data listed below without notifying you first.

Data Collected Automatically

When you visit and use our Site, we may automatically collect and store the following information:

1. IP address;

2. Location:

3. Hardware and software details;

4. Clicked links; and

5. Content viewed.

Data Collected in a Non-Automatic Way.

We may also collect the following data when you perform certain functions on our Site:

1. First and last name;

2. Email address:

3. Phone number; and

4. Address

This data may be collected using the following methods

1. Contact form

How We Use Personal Data

Data collected on our Site will only be used for the purposes specified in this Privacy Policy or indicated on the relevant pages of our

Site. We will not use your data beyond what we disclose in this Privacy Policy.

The data we collect automatically is used for the following purposes:

1. Statistics.

The data we collect when the user performs certain functions may be used for the following purposes:

1. Communication.

Who We Share Personal Data With

Employees

We may disclose user data to any member of our organization who reasonably needs access to user data to achieve the purposes set out in this Privacy Policy.

Other Disclosures

We will not sell or share your data with other third parties, except in the following cases:

If the law requires it;

If it is required for any legal proceeding;

To prove or protect our legal rights; and

To buyers or potential buyers of this company in the event that we seek to sell the company.

If you follow hyperlinks from our Site to another Site, please note that we are not responsible for and have no control over their privacy policies and practices.

How Long We Store Personal Data

User data will be stored until the purpose the data was collected for has been achieved.

You will be notified if your data is kept for longer than this period.

How We Protect Your Personal Data

In order to protect your security, we use the strongest available browser encryption and store all of our data on servers in secure facilities. All data is only accessible to our employees. Our employees are bound by strict confidentiality agreements and a breach of this agreement would result in the employee's termination.

While we take all reasonable precautions to ensure that user data is secure and that users are protected, there always remains the risk of harm. The Internet as a whole can be insecure at times and therefore we are unable to guarantee the security of user data beyond what is reasonably practical.

International Data Transfers

We transfer user personal data to the following countries:

1. UAE; and

2. Turkey.

When we transfer user personal data we will protect that data as described in this Privacy Policy and comply with applicable legal

requirements for transferring personal data internationally.

If you are located in the United Kingdom or the European Union, we will only transfer your personal data if:

The country your personal data is being transferred to has been deemed to have adequate data protection by the European Commission or, if you are in the United Kingdom, by the United Kingdom adequacy regulations; or

We have implemented appropriate safeguards in respect of the transfer. For example, the recipient is a party to binding corporate rules, or we have entered into standard EU or United Kingdom data protection contractual clauses with the recipient .

Your Rights as a User

Under the GDPR, you have the following rights:

Right to be informed;

Right of access;

Right to rectification;

Right to erasure;

Right to restrict processing;

6. Right to data portability; and

7. Right to object.

Children

We do not knowingly collect or use personal data from children under 16 years of age. If we learn that we have collected personal data from a child under 16 years of age, the personal data will be deleted as soon as possible. If a child under 16 years of age has provided us with personal data their parent or guardian may contact our privacy officer.

How to Access, Modify, Delete, or Challenge the Data Collected

If you would like to know if we have collected your personal data, how we have used your personal data, if we have disclosed your personal data and to who we disclosed your personal data, if you would like your data to be deleted or modified in any way, or if you would like to exercise any of your other rights under the GDPR, please contact our privacy officer here:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Do Not Track Notice

Do Not Track ("DNT") is a privacy preference that you can set in certain web browsers. We respond to browser-initiated DNT signals. If we receive a DNT signal that indicates a user does not wish to be tracked, we will not track that user.

How to Opt-Out of Data Collection, Use or Disclosure

Access, Modify, Delete, or Challenge the Data Collected section, we provide the following specific opt-out methods for the forms of collection, use, or disclosure of your personal data specified below:

You can opt-out of the use of your personal data for marketing emails. You can opt-out by clicking "unsubscribe" on the bottom of any marketing email or updating your email preferences under "Your Account"

Cookie Policy

A cookie is a small file, stored on a user's hard drive by a website. Its purpose is to collect data relating to the user's browsing habits. You can choose to be notified each time a cookie is transmitted. You can also choose to disable cookies entirely in your internet browser, but this may decrease the quality of your user experience.

We use the following types of cookies on our Site:

Functional cookies

Functional cookies are used to remember the selections you make on our Site so that your selections are saved for your next visits;

Analytical cookies

Analytical cookies allow us to improve the design and functionality of our Site by collecting data on how you access our Site, for example data on the content you access, how long you stay on our Site, etc;

Targeting cookies

Targeting cookies collect data on how you use the Site and your preferences. This allows us to personalize the information you see on our Site for you; and

Third-Party Cookies

Third-party cookies are created by a website other than ours. We may use third-party cookies to achieve the following purposes:

Monitor user preferences to tailor advertisements around their interests.

Modifications

This Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time in order to maintain compliance with the law and to reflect any changes to our data collection process. When we amend this Privacy Policy we will update the "Effective Date" at the top of this Privacy Policy. We recommend that our users periodically review our Privacy Policy to ensure that they are notified of any updates. If necessary, we may notify users by email of changes to this Privacy Policy.

Complaints

If you have any complaints about how we process your personal data, please contact us through the contact methods listed in the Contact Information section so that we can, where possible, resolve the issue. If you feel we have not addressed your concern in a satisfactory manner you may contact a supervisory authority. You also have the right to directly make a complaint to a supervisory authority. You can lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority by contacting the __________________________________________________________________________.

Contact Information

If you have any questions, concerns or complaints, you can contact our privacy officer, ________,at:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________